Two working agents by mid-afternoon. A team that now talks about how it works.
- The problem
- ASG delivers drone services, training and consultancy across defence, law enforcement and other regulated environments. cyberISMS runs managed IT, cyber security and compliance. Neither can afford to experiment freely with AI.
- On the day
- A hands-on day for six of the team, on their own tasks, with the governance their work demands. Afterwards, a private debrief site with every question answered and a plan for 30 days to 24 months.
- What they built
- Two working agents by mid-afternoon: a six-step proposal workflow with checks built in, and a policy agent that reviews by exception. It flagged real legal changes on its very first run.
- Since then
- In the client's words: quicker, better-quality outputs, improved consistency and useful challenge, and a “measured but very noticeable” increase in AI use across bid reviews, financial forecasting and marketing planning.
- Not measured yet
- Time saved, cost or financial return. It's early days, and figures will only go here once they've been measured.
It was an excellent day and a very worthwhile investment for us.
It is still early days, but we are already seeing quicker and better-quality outputs, improved consistency and useful challenge. Perhaps the most noticeable difference is in the conversation across the team: people are regularly talking about how they are approaching tasks and sharing snippets and ideas from the day. That feels like a useful change in working practice rather than simply greater use of another tool.
Ian Punton CEng MRAeS FCMI, Director, ASG Ltd
Thank you again for your time. It's been hugely beneficial to my AI use going forward.
Gary Moore, cyberISMS